Exercitation ullamco laboris nis aliquip sed conseqrure dolorn repreh deris ptate velit ecepteur duis.
Are your SAP roles accurate and well-organised? Do they follow a systematic and easy-to-understand naming convention? Do your managers complain about not understanding the access they are signing off for their users? Have segregation of duties and other security violations been identified in your roles or user access?
Often, roles are created to meet business needs without much consideration to security requirements. As a result, you may find fully-functional roles which violate segregation of duties (SoD) or critical access risks.
On the other hand, the complexity of SAP authorisations can lead to roles giving more access than indicated by the role names. This could put you in a position where, while your roles comply with security requirements, they are cumbersome and difficult to manage, requiring maintenance work to be performed every month.
We follow a time-tested, systematic role-building concept which meets business requirements, access framework and standardised role-naming convention. Our aim is to help you fix, redesign and create roles which you can easily maintain afterwards.
*Our common best practice access risk rulebook will be used unless you already have a robust, tailored access risk rulebook. If you do not and would like to have one developed, we can help you as part of our Access Framework service.
Take our free quiz here for a quick high-level view of your SAP access environment!
OR, if you are ready for a more thorough assessment:
Get in touch and we’ll walk you through a 30-minute diagnostic about your SAP access environment. We’ll evaluate the various aspects of SAP access management with you and suggest areas where improvements can be achieved.